CSG – When Brad Hazzard came to town (Casino)

This is the Casino prequel to Brad Hazzard’s more recent Lismore visit.

On Thursday April 19, Brad Hazzard, the NSW Minister for Planning and Infrastructure, came to Casino for what was billed as a “forum”.  I think, by now, most of our communities have realised that such events, along with their cousins, “community consultations”, are almost never actual avenues for anyone to listen to the community.  These events are simply convenient sales platforms for politicians or company representatives to market their point of view, while at the same time ticking a regulatory box about “consultation”.  Do I sound jaded?

Hundreds of us turned up to the forum anyway.  We had to.  It appears that the politicians charged with making important decisions about the future of our land, water, lives, and health are unaware, actually unaware, of basic facts about unconventional gas mining.

My first hint was when the committee of the NSW Legislative Council Inquiry into Coal Seal Gas visited Kyogle on their way to Alstonville.  I found myself talking with the Hon. Dr Peter Primrose, one of the committee.  The committee had just been to visit one of Metgasco’s local sites, but in the course of the conversation it transpired that Primrose wasn’t familiar with the name Metgasco.  They’d also recently flown in a plane over the gasfields in Qld, but Primrose couldn’t remember where in Qld he’d flown over.  Was he not paying attention?

These were small details to forget, but as it turns out, they are representative of a broader phenomenon.  On the same day, Robert Brown, the head of the inquiry, told me he believed that the mining companies knew how to purify the salt from the produced water and sell it, possibly as food grade.  Now, there exists no technology that has the ability to purify salt from produced water to food grade standard.  None.  If you’re from a mining company, and you can enlighten me, please do and I’ll retract what I just said.  And even if you could purify it to industrial standards, which industry would buy this estimated 30 million tonnes of salt?  Really.

More recently, I phoned the offices of the members of the NSW Upper House to express my concerns about CSG mining.  In early March, I phoned the Hon. Rick Colless, the Deputy Government Whip in the Legislative Council and member of the above CSG Inquiry committee.  The report of the committee is due very soon (May 3) so I’d have hoped that the committee members would be pretty much on top of the issue by now.  However, when I spoke to him, he told me “there’s a lot of misinformation about”, implying that people opposed to CSG mining were simply uninformed.  When I asked him to give me an example, he said “Did you know that Gasland is not coal seam gas?”

Now, I’m very grateful that Mr Colless actually picked up his phone.  Every other member I called either had a staffer answer, or an answering machine (with no reply to my messages).  So thank you to Rick, who at least listened, and tried to explain his point of view.  However, there are two things wrong with a member of the NSW Legislative Council Committee of Inquiry into Coal Seam Gas asking me if I knew Gasland wasn’t CSG.  First,  it shows that he thinks that people opposed to CSG mining are unaware of basic facts about CSG mining (such as the distinctions and similarities between coal seam gas, tight sand and shale gas mining).  Does he really think, really and truly, that people opposed to CSG have decided to give up days, weeks, months of their time to lobby against CSG without first doing some basic, and even in-depth, research into its consequences and potential benefits?  If politicians hold such a low opinion of voters, no wonder they’re not paying any attention to our views.

So actually, yes, I did know that most unconventional gas mining in the US is for shale gas, and Gasland is a US movie.  But I also know another very basic fact about CSG mining of which Mr Colless was obviously unaware.  The different types of unconventional gas mining (and I had to explain to him that unconventional gas is the umbrella term used to describe difficult-to-extract-gas, such as CSG, shale gas and tight sand gas because he didn’t know ) have similar environmental and health consequences.  More specifically, the exposure pathways to toxins are virtually identical.  So just because Gasland describes the problems of shale gas extraction, doesn’t mean that those problems don’t have relevance to CSG mining in Australia.

Here’s an example.  Produced water from all types of unconventional gas (even in the absence of fracking) can contain large amounts of salts as well as more serious toxins from drilling chemicals and from the coal seam or shale/sand deposit itself.  In fact, coal seam gas mining results in far greater volumes of produced water from the coal seam than does shale gas mining.  So in terms of toxic produced water, CSG is worse than Gasland.

Another example of identical exposure pathways is the air pollution associated with gaseous contaminants in the extracted methane.  It’s impossible to tell in advance what contaminants will be in the methane from any particular well, and thus, what contaminants will escape to surrounding areas.  The northern rivers may have squeaky clean methane, but it’s unlikely.  A report by Global Community Monitor (GCM), found an array of neurotoxins, carcinogens and respiratory irritants, some of which were at levels thousands of times the recommended maximum, in the air surrounding schools, playgrounds and homes in the vicinity of gas developments – including CSG.  In early March, less than 2 months before the due date for the Inquiry report, Rick Colless was unaware of the GCM document.  On April 19, at the Casino forum, our pro-gas Thomas George was unaware of it.  How can any politician claim to be qualified to make serious decisions about CSG mining in Australia without having read this report?  (If Global Community Monitor is insufficiently reputable or independent for our politicians, here’s a peer-reviewed article from the Colorado School of Public Health, published in a scientific journal.  It says very similar things.)

But it’s not only Peter, Robert, Rick and Thomas who don’t seem to know the facts.  At the forum, in response to a question from the audience, Brad Hazzard blithely claimed that no farmer in NSW had been adversely affected by CSG mining.  This is of course untrue, and several examples were forthcoming from the audience.  He didn’t know even what was happening in NSW.  He also wilfully ignored the demonstrated adverse effects in other jurisdictions (which are more than likely to be replicated in NSW) by turning the question around to avoid addressing the experiences of farmers in Queensland and overseas.

Mr Hazzard, if we’ve done more research than you, and we know more about the actual consequences of CSG mining than you, who are you to tell us that “NSW has these resources [including CSG]…and if you think we’re going to leave them in the ground, then I’m sorry, it’s not going to happen.”  You’re not qualified to make that decision.

I would suggest that no-one who hasn’t read the following documents is qualified to make that decision.

  • Fractured Communities. This report, from New York Riverkeeper,  gives example after example of mining companies in the US ignoring environmental regulations, dumping toxic materials into waterways, livestock deaths, explosions, health problems and so on.  If NSW is to avoid situations like these, it is essential that our politicians be aware of potential problems like these in advance.  Otherwise, why should the behaviour of mining companies in Australia be any different from that in the US?  Kyogle GAG included a summary of this report in its submission to the NSW Legislative Council Inquiry into CSG, and included the full document details in the reference section.  It’s easily available online.
  • Mining the Truth.  This document was released at the end of last year, and details the differences between what the mining industry tells you (yes, that includes politicians) and the actual facts.  It’s published by the Australia Institute.
  • Hydraulic Fracturing in Coal Seam Gas Mining.  From the National Toxics Network.  Often, pro-gas people claim that CSG wells require far less stimulation than shale gas wells, so for NSW (where the vast majority of unconventional gas is CSG) reports about fracking are “irrelevant”.  However, while CSG wells may require less fracking in their early stages, the likelihood of fracking increases greatly as the well gets older.  It would be negligent to make decisions about CSG mining without being apprised of the associated environmental and health consequences.  Additionally, this report includes a discussion of drilling chemicals, which are used for every well.
  • Zero Carbon Australia ” by Beyond Zero Emissions.  This is a detailed, costed blueprint for the transition to a decarbonised Australian economy by 2020.  It casts considerable doubt on Brad Hazzard’s casual assertion that we need CSG as a transition fuel.  When he said it last Thursday, I imagine he meant to imply that opposition to CSG mining was unrealistic pie-in-the-sky.  However, as a friend of mine says, “it simply showed that he is ignorant.”  Please have a look at this report, Brad.  

Now, community members, for free, on top of their usual jobs, have pored over brick-thick mining documents as well as these independent reports.  So I don’t think it’s too much to ask our elected representatives, who are charged with the responsibility for making important decisions about our future (and moreover are paid for their efforts) to at least read the summaries.  It’s not good enough to dismiss these reports simply because they may refer to a different kind of unconventional gas mining, or because they are about the situation in another state or country.  They ARE relevant because the different types of unconventional gas mining have similar environmental, health and social consequences, and because what has happened in other jurisdictions is the most reliable guide we have to what is likely to happen in NSW.

So Mr Hazzard, and all the politicians who hold the honour of deciding our future.  Remember that you are dealing with the future of real life people, to whom this issue is one of life and death.  Our health, land and livelihoods are at stake.  Because this is so important to us, we have spent enormous amounts of time and effort delving beneath industry spin and researching the real facts about the effects of CSG mining.  We have given you the privilege of representing us, and we cannot accept your dismissal of our opposition to CSG because you think we have simply watched Gasland and become hysterical.

It appears to us that you have simply taken industry spin at face value, and ignored the real facts.  It is very important that you base your decision on real facts, not simply what the mining industry tells you.  Please read at least these independent reports as soon as you can.  There are more, and if you finish with these, please contact me and I’ll give you a list of references.  So-called “independent” reports commissioned by mining companies don’t count.  Neither do reports written by consultants who also have separate contracts with mining companies.    I can write you summaries, hand deliver you documents, whatever.  I will drive into town to the library computers, take time out of planting vegies, neglect the fruit trees.  Let me know and I will do whatever makes it easier for you to just READ THOSE REPORTS.

Because my life depends on it.

Thank you.

Share
This entry was posted in Coal seam gas, Social commentary and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to CSG – When Brad Hazzard came to town (Casino)

  1. Sarah says:

    PS I’d just like to say, because I need to vent this, when I asked a prominent local pro-gas politician if he’d read any independent reports about the effects of CSG mining, he said, “What’s independent? You know, some people don’t even think government reports are independent.” He was implying that those people were wrong, and in the minority.

    Who has this man been talking to? I don’t know anyone who thinks government reports about CSG are independent. “Independent” implies no financial or other kind of vested interest. Here are just some of the reasons why no-one I know thinks politicians’/government reports are independent:

    • Alan Jones’ FOI (Freedom of Information) list of ex-politicians who now have well-paid mining industry lobbying jobs
    • the ex-pollies who hold executive positions in mining companies
    • many current politicians’ apparently wilful ignorance about renewable energy technologies and the social, environmental and health consequences of unconventional gas mining
    • the NSW government using the precautionary principle for windfarms, but not for CSG
    • the NSW government introducing, with much fanfare, completely ineffective measures to control CSG and other unconventional gas mining

    End of vent.

  2. Angie says:

    Thanks for writing this report. Shame on the decision makers who can’t be bothered to find out what they need to know before they shape our future. We know so much more than they do because we actually care! It was frustrating, but predictable at the Hazzard meeting. I hated his little jokes, his patronising ignorance and his bullying.

    • Charmaine says:

      Hazzard the same at the Gunnedah forum where he actually told someone to “SSHHH”. Patronising, ignorant & dangerous. God help us!

  3. Wallaroo says:

    It sounds exactly the same as the meeting in the Hunter recently. I am distraught about what is going on. I have just finished Rich Land, WasteLand how coal is killing Australia by Sharyn Munro. It must be read by all. http://www.richlandwasteland.com
    I will be marching on Tuesday.

  4. Jhabel says:

    I myself attended that joke of a forum at Casino , I was in the front row in fact. The comments made by Brad Hazzard with regard to the region’s resources to be utilized , totally disregards the bio-diversity of this region , (second only to Kakadu) as a resource to be valued and preserved, for too long there has been No value placed apon our natural and clean environments, this is the main reason we are in the Global mess we currently are in. CSG is not a suitable transition fuel there are far too many risks involved and the uptake of solar and renewable energy needs to be accelerated instead of downgraded, ie the wind farm regulations and the removal of rebates for solar power. The O’Farrell govt has no foresight, and we the people of the Northern Rivers do, lets not be victims and with hindsight say “Oh we shouldn’t have let CSG in”
    because our grandchildren will hold us accountable for our inaction!

  5. Anne Kennedy says:

    Sarah, thank you so much for this brilliant, detailed and thorough article. Thanks also for including all the links to the wonderful articles and papers by New York Riverkeeper, BZE, Australia Institute, NTN etc.; I only wish our political representatives were as well-read and knowledgeable as you. It is frightening – no, it is terrifying – that the future of our water, land, and health, is in the hands of people who don’t even know (or bother to learn) the basic facts.

  6. Carolyn says:

    Scary stuff. I started researching CSG mining about 2010..when I somehow came across Texas Sharons website. When I sent an extensive email to Steve Cansdell, our state member at the time, expressing alarm at this form of mining, I got a patronising phone call one evening which in effect was …stop worrying little lady, that Gasland movie is not correct,,doesnt apply to Australia etc. I was horrified at how little he actually knew about it.
    I think this thinking is still rife in the govt, (we are all just freaked out about Gasland and will all settle down eventually!) They are about to get a rude awakening, the people have run far ahead of them.

  7. Carolyn says:

    p.s. And thanks for a great piece of writing and links to explore.

  8. john says:

    All the articles listed have vested interests in regards to stopping any type of resource growth. Where are all the articles that show a balanced approach – lets not cast the first stone to far huh sarah ?

    • Sarah says:

      Hi John,

      It’s very important to me to base my decisions about CSG on as unbiased and accurate information as I can. Obviously, I don’t agree with you that these reports are written by people with vested interests.

      Can you tell me what their vested interests are? And have you actually read the reports? If you’re going to try the Fox News “let’s-be-balanced” tactic, please at least be specific about where these reports are imbalanced.

      I look forward to hearing back from you.

      Sarah.
      PS I notice your email is “csgtruth@gmail.com”. No doubt you’re just an average bloke who, in his spare time, goes online to defend CSG mining – and if that’s the case, well done to you for sticking up for what you believe in. But I would suggest that if you are an ordinary bloke in favour of CSG mining, then you haven’t read the above reports. Please, please read them. Or perhaps – could it be that you are part of the marketing arm of the mining industry?

  9. Marny says:

    Thank you so much Sarah for taking even more time to write this excellent summary. What you have expressed is what so many of us are feeling. On top of all this is the ongoing fear, worry and anxiety around this industry; friction in relationships where one partner is more heavily involved than the other, sadness of division in communities, despondency and disbelief as Aussies who facilitate and are employed in this industry treat fellow Aussies who are suffering from this industry with such contempt. I doubt there’d be any mental health issues for the highly paid polluticians who work hard to protect their party line, their own careers and vested interests, as they scramble to simply make another move on what they see as merely a political game of chess with the great unwashed. For them a game of chess; for us a game of snakes and ladders. How they fail to realise that this is the biggest issue since the Franklin Dam and Terania Creek protest movements – and how that worked out for the governments of the day – is just another symptom of their myopic modus operandi.

  10. Liora says:

    Thanks Sarah for this great article.

    I was at the Lismore meeting. Once again they came with platitudes, but this time left shaken. Brad Hazzard . . . Health Hazzard.

    I was also at the parliamentary enquiry held in Alstonville and came away disgusted. It galls me that tax payer’s money goes in to paying for this rubbish. All the speakers spoke against CSG. Most were educated, well informed, articulate – in some cases as with Dr. Marion Lloyd Smith and Dr. Wayne Summerville, professionals who were trying to communicate the dangers. The only person showing any interest in the process was Jeremy Buckingham. It was obvious that the others were simply there for show – so that the government could say there had been a parliamentary enquiry.

    This is WW3 – the fight for our survival, the fight for our environment, the fight against greed, ignorance and power to protect grace, beauty and sanity. No-one goes to renew their personal energies in mine fields – they go to the beach and rainforest. Let’s live to protect and preserve.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>